A new
photographic gallery in an old palace provides a fresh paradigm for
heritage conservation, says
MITA KAPUR
 |
|
JOHNSON &
HOFFMAN , 1881 |
THE ‘LONG exposure’ –
that’s what it was. Roger Fenton, the first photographer of war,
covered the Crimean War (1853–1856) and produced 360 photographs
over less than four months. In the age of digicams, one may shrug
off the number as well as the extremity of the circumstances, living
as we do in a constant state of ‘instant’ conflict, violence and
terror. But Fenton had to carry chemicals, glass plates and dark
room tents into a hostile environment to manage this feat. Samuel
Bourne photographed the Manirung Pass in the Himalayas — the highest
point on earth to be photographed — in 1862. He carried 700 glass
plates and came back with 300 good negatives. The beginning of the
19th century saw exciting transformations in the photographic
process. The time taken to expose a print came down from 8 hours,
first to 30 minutes, and then to two. The idea was to make
photography faster, cheaper, better. There was a specific reason why
photography evolved the way it did. Just as there was a particular
reason why I was standing in the Zenana Mahal of the City Palace of
Udaipur, viewing with wonder, the pictorial archives of the
Maharanas of Mewar from 1857 to 1957. The images on view as part of
Long Exposure: The Camera at Udaipur, 1857–1957, the
inaugural exhibition of the new Bhagwat Prakash Gallery at the City
Palace Museum, Udaipur, are a veritable sea of stories. For one, the
camera arrived in Udaipur several years before photography’s
official arrival in India in 1840. The camera obscura, an optical
device and a predecessor to the modern-day camera, is known to have
been used in Udaipur as early as 1818. Captain James Tod (later
Colonel), the intrepid British political agent at the Court of Mewar,
explained its functions to amuse the ailing heir apparent, Prince
Amar Singh, the older son of Maharana Bhim Singh. From the mid-19th
to the early 20th centuries, printing on albumen, platinum and
gelatin silver became common. Today, the pictorial archives of the
Maharanas of Mewar comprise photographic materials ranging from
glass-plate negatives to card photographs, photomontages and painted
photographs, in which the names of well-known photographic studios —
like the Calcutta-based Johnston and Hoffmann and the Mhowbased
Herzog and Higgins — stand out. The current exhibition takes us
through the reign of five successive rulers of Mewar. The earliest
images in the archives can be dated to the reign of Maharana Swaroop
Singh (1842–1861), although there are none of the ruler himself. The
first known photographs of a Maharana are of Swaroop Singh’s
successor, Shambu Singh. The initial exhibits are portraits of the
Maharanas and their functionaries, often in the carte-de-visite
format (photographs the size of a visiting card), which was the most
prevalent form of mass photography at the time.
|
The camera came
to Udaipur with James Tod, several years before its official
arrival in India in 1840 |
The exhibition is
thoughtfully curated and well researched, displaying not just the
regalia of the Maharanas of Mewar in court, but also scenes that
portray the king in relation to the people of his state. There are
some more intimate images as well: like one of Maharana Bhupal Singh
with his father Fateh Singh, in the presence of Prince Albert
Victor. It is a rare image because it is the only photograph of
father and son together — and it acquires even more value as a
visual document because during Fateh Singh’s reign, there were no
paintings commissioned to document the royal family.
But as Pramod Kumar, the
curator of the gallery, says, “This is a photography show, not just
a historical lesson. If it shows the move from feudalism to
democracy, it also showcases the evolution of photo journalism.” If
photographs from Fateh Singh’s reign are true to the spirit of royal
custodianship that characterised the period, images from the
post-1947 period show Maharana Bhagwat Singh (b. 1921–1984) with
leaders of independent India. Jewel photographs, photographs on
platinum impregnated on paper, card-mounted photographs on ceramic
plates: different techniques mark several journeys – historical and
pictorial.
This is the first state-ofthe-
art photography gallery in all of Rajasthan, with museum specific
lights and frames and mount material of acid free archival quality.
It also reveals the contributions that many well known painters made
to photography, once photography became the art that received royal
patronage. A photograph of Fateh Singh in durbar at the Mor Chowk,
for instance, was painted over by artist Panna Lal Parasuran Gaud,
creating a stunning play of colour and shadows. Another effect that
stands out is the adding of colour to the photographic landscape,
perfected by famous landscape artist SG Thakkar Singh.
|
The gallery,
housed in Udaipur’s City Palace, is the first
state-of-the-art photography gallery in all of Rajasthan |
During Maharana Sajjan
Singh’s rule (1874–1884), photography as a discipline provided
several alternative formats and media, with a wide range of
presentation options. The largest number of portraits using multiple
formats, media and sizes were added during his time. There are also
beautiful photographs that show off Udaipur as a city of lakes and
palaces.
SHREEJI, Arvind Singhji
of Mewar, explains what made him think of creating a state of the
art photography gallery within the antiquated precincts of the City
Palace in Udaipur. “We cannot look at the city palace as a palace
built 500 years ago, full stop. We look at it as a palace built 500
years ago that is still continuing to evolve.” The photography
gallery is just the beginning, he points out. “We are planning a
silver gallery, a painting gallery and a musical instruments gallery
along the same lines.”
“I’m not saying that
properties such as the Taj and the Chittor palace shouldn’t be
promoted or conserved, but it’s imperative to understand the
importance between a living heritage and a monument. A monument may
have a cut-off point, but a living heritage must allow for change if
it is to pay for itself. And mark my words, in ten years’ time, this
state of the art complex will be what is piggy-backed upon to
showcase our heritage.”
|